The /level list

[Zutroy]

No, of course not.

Bedevere - Midgard
Bors - Albion
Bors - Hibernia
Galahad - Hibernia
Galahad - Midgard
Gawaine - Midgard
Igraine - Midgard
Lancelot - Hibernia
Lancelot - Midgard
Merlin - Hibernia
Palomides - Hibernia
Palomides - Midgard
Percival - Hibernia

[Nari]

Figures.

[Zutroy]

Heh, look at the stats of midgard on bedevere. They have all 3 power relics and are less than 1 million behind Alb in total RPs.

If you look at Lancelot, midgard is actually in the lead for total RPs and Albs have no relics.

Same situation on Palo.

Hib doesn't seem to be doing that bad on Percival either.

What the hell did they base these on? Raw population numbers?

[Amberryl]

im confused... does this mean we dont get /level??!?!?!?!?

[Masta]

ROFL! That has to be on the most Fk'ed up things i've ever seen.

Mythic needs to go over that and base it on something better than population charts, retards.

And yeah amber, iseult get's no 30's.

[Caohmin]

Amb - it means we only get the /level 20 and not the 30.

[Axecleaver]

I kinda knew they'd do it that way. They're not publishing how they got to those numbers because it's too simple, and they didn't want to take shit for it.

Oh well -- it'll be a nice tool for levelling alts on other servers. So where do we want to roll BG toons?

[Amberryl]

ty coah for clearing that up 0_o

[Zutroy]

'We aren't going to publish the method for how we determine the line between the normal ebb and flow of a server and a true population imbalance. There are several reasons for this decision, but one of the major ones is that we don't want to create a situation where people might be tempted to manipulate the system just to get free level 30s. That's not a good idea for a number of reasons (not least being that it won't work - we're looking for statistical patterns, not simple temporary anomalies), so we will attempt to avoid the problem altogether.'

Uh, that sounds like a load of BS to me. Their major reason for not allowing us to know is because we might exploit it? Then she says its impossible for us to exploit it. Which one is it?

And last I checked, Alb/Iseult has been at the bottom of the RP charts for nearly a full year now. But I guess that's just the "normal ebb and flow".

[Zutroy]

Here's an interesting list. All the servers that got free 30's have an * next to them.

server Populations
Bedevere:
Albion: 1099(43.00)
Hibernia: 766(29.97)
Midgard: 691(27.03)*
Bors:
Albion: 668(27.83)*
Hibernia: 611(25.46)*
Midgard: 1121(46.71)
Galahad:
Albion: 1198(41.07)
Hibernia: 852(29.21)*
Midgard: 867(29.72)*
Gawaine:
Albion: 1119(41.11)
Hibernia: 914(33.58)
Midgard: 689(25.31)*
Guinevere:
Albion: 1712(37.82)
Hibernia: 1403(30.99)
Midgard: 1412(31.19)
Igraine:
Albion: 1007(39.23)
Hibernia: 964(37.55)
Midgard: 596(23.22)*
Iseult:
Albion: 588(26.87)
Hibernia: 822(37.57)
Midgard: 778(35.56)
Kay:
Albion: 772(30.93)
Hibernia: 867(34.74)
Midgard: 857(34.33)
Lancelot:
Albion: 1708(44.18)
Hibernia: 992(25.66)*
Midgard: 1166(30.16)*
Merlin:
Albion: 1142(40.40)
Hibernia: 657(23.24)*
Midgard: 1028(36.36)
Morgan:
Albion: 1318(36.26)
Hibernia: 1264(34.77)
Midgard: 1053(28.97)
Nimue:
Albion: 610(30.92)
Hibernia: 666(33.76)
Midgard: 697(35.33)
Palomides:
Albion: 1079(45.76)
Hibernia: 632(26.80)*
Midgard: 647(27.44)*
Pellinor:
Albion: 763(35.11)
Hibernia: 758(34.88)
Midgard: 652(30.00)
Percival:
Albion: 1484(36.90)
Hibernia: 1127(28.02)*
Midgard: 1411(35.08)
Tristan:
Albion: 849(35.04)
Hibernia: 852(35.16)
Midgard: 722(29.80)

Gonna try crunching some numbers and see if I can find the specific % they used. It seems alb/iseult just barely fell short of it whatever it was.

Edit: Found the percentages. Highest was 45.4% (from Hib/Bors) lowest was 24.0% (from Hib/Percival).
 
Realms that didn't get free 30's but scored above 24%:
Alb/Iseult was at 28.5%
Hib/Bedevere was at 30.3%

Edit #2 - Note that the lowest % after Hib/Percival was Mid/Galhad with 27.6%. Also note that no servers with less than 1000 people in the dominate realm got free 30s.

Edit #3 - Notice that Alb/Iseult actually has the lowest population of any realm on any server.

(Edited by Zutroy at 7:58 pm on June 2, 2003)

[Rosslyn]

where are those numbers published?

[Kirin]

hmm.. damn. hey Zut why dont you send these numbers to the devs or Sanya, see if you get anything?
i know they probably dont give a second crap, but might be worth a try

[Malison]

So I think we should pick a mid server and all roll bandwagoners  

Then pick a hib server and roll  the 30s and see how powerful a hib group can be with 9s stun.

[Zutroy]

Those numbers were from June 1st, taking into account all level 35+ with at least 500 RPs the last week. I found it in that official thread started by sanya on the dev board. It's about 1/2 way down the first page.

[Malison]

Oddly enough, i've seen conflicting reports on this.  Kate's active numbers at least, seem to indicate that hib is the lowest populated realm, and mid and alb are tied.  We have a lot of casual RvR people.

Something I've been noticing lately, somewhat unrelated.  We haven't been able to claim a keep during the late afternoon/early evening because there have been no officers online to invite temps?  Can someone please promote Duran or something